However, without a simple limited partnership, a silent partner, as a partner, is responsible for the company`s debts. (See: Komplenurr, Kommanditgesellschaft, Partner) In one of the last places where it is always natural for the majority of those present to remain silent, the current project wants to stage silence as a material presence and treat it as audio material, form, music, rhythm and gesture – a monstrous presence that transcends categories and limits. Unlike coercion and undue influence in cases of illegitimate pressure or alleged unlawful influence, which depends on an abuse of trust, other cases of a vulnerable person avoid an agreement simply because they are vulnerable and exploited. In the Medina, the Court of Appeal found that a group of pilgrims who had sunk on a Red Sea rock did not have to pay $4,000 promised to a rescue ship because the “saviors” had taken advantage of the vulnerable situation of the pilgrims. To avoid unfair enrichment, the Court replaced an arbitration award of $1800. Similarly, in Cresswell, Ms. Cresswell gave her ex-husband her share of her common assets in exchange for the release of mortgage repayments, which then earned her a profit of $1400. As Potter took advantage of Ms. Creswell`s ignorance of real estate transactions, Megarry J felt that the agreement was void.  One possible exception to this model, which is now very limited, is the “no is factum” defence, which originally applied in the 19th century in favour of illiterates who allowed a person to invalidate a signed contract if it was fundamentally different from what he intended to do.  In Lloyds Bank Ltd/Bundy, Lord Denning MR suggested that it was time to place all cases in a single doctrine of “unequal bargaining power”.
 This would have allowed an agreement to be avoided if, in the absence of independent advice, a person`s ability to negotiate on better terms had been seriously compromised and had essentially given the courts more leeway to amend contracts for the benefit of weaker parties. The idea of a uniform general doctrine was rejected by some members of the House of Lords from 1979.  However, specific legislation such as the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the Landlord and Tenant Act of 1985 or the Employment Rights Act of 1996 create specific rights for contracting parties that lack bargaining power, as well as specific legislation that rewrites a disclosure obligation and good faith. Just as there is no uniform theory of bargaining power, a uniform doctrine of contractual freedom was dismantled long ago, where the parties do not do business in the course of business.  The general right to exercise the contract is a rule of non-compliance, as it limits the application of an agreement to those who have considered an agreement. In an early case, Tweddle v Atkinson, it was found that a son, because he had ignored his father`s promise to pay $200 to his father, could not keep the promise.  Given the principle that the exercise of the duty should take into account the responsible person who has a legitimate interest in their performance, a 1996 report by the 1996 Legal Commission, Privity of Contracts: Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties, recommended that, while allowing the courts the freedom to develop the common law, some of the blatant unfairness should be eliminated.  This gave rise to the Third Party Rights Act in 1999. Under Section 1, a third party may impose an agreement if it purports to grant a benefit to the third party, either individually or to a member as a class, and if there is no express provision that the person did not intend to apply it.
 In this regard, the party that asserts that the execution is not contemplated by a third party places a heavy burden.  A third party has the same remedies as a person who enters into an agreement and can impose both positive benefits and liability limitations such as an exclusion clause.  The rights of a third party cannot then be